Unequally yoked: Don Lemon criminal case update.

Breaking News: Don Lemon’s cooperation with the Government last week appears to have been short-lived. Last week, Lemon was applauded by the Government for assisting with the search of Lemon’s iPhone. But this week, the Government was forced to litigate Lemon’s Motion to Suppress Cellphone Search. What gives? Can Lemon litigate two opposing viewpoints in a single case? I break it all down! 0:04 Lemon cooperated with the Government in the search of his iPhone, but now says those search results must be suppressed. 0:43 Lemon’s cooperation was extensive. He demanded, and received, special treatment. 1:36 Lemon’s cellphone was seized during his arrest, in Los Angeles. 2:04 Government reveals Lemon reached for, and tried to use, his cellphone, at the time of arrest. 2:45 Government says Lemon’s cooperation was so extensive, it must be characterized as “consent to search." 3:38 Lemon’s iPhone probably contains evidence of his actions as an agitator (not journalist) regarding the attack on Cities Church. 3:52 Government explains all the reasons why Lemon is viewed as an agitator, not a journalist. 5:20 Lemon’s attorneys were taken by surprise. They thought narrowing the parameters of the search would yield results favorable to Lemon.