Safety & securityBodycam Exposed TVDriver Asleep in the Road Gave Police 4 Different Birth Years - Then Her Breath Test Read 0.3

Driver Asleep in the Road Gave Police 4 Different Birth Years - Then Her Breath Test Read 0.3

Long-form38:59EducationPublished Oct 18, 2026, 1:33 PM · 4d ago
Views
455
+1 views/hour
Views / hour now
1
measured 41m ago
Peak views / hour
2
3h ago
First 24 hours
—
not tracked from upload
Engagement
19.1%
likes + comments / views
Likes
85
18.7% of views
Comments
2
0.44% of views
Est. ad revenue
$3–$7
lifetime, $7.2–15.6 RPM

Checked every 3 h while the video is this age · last check 41m ago · next in 138 min. YouTube itself updates public counts with a short delay.

Avg views / day
106
since upload
vs channel median
0.6×
this video's views ÷ the channel's usual
Rank in channel
#20
of 22 tracked

Views over time

4 readings

Total views Views gained per hour

Description

On December 12, 2025, police in Washington answered a welfare call about a woman unconscious in a car in the roadway. Four birth years. Three denials. One arrest. The driver said "I wasn't driving" and treated that as the end of the matter, but Washington law asks a different question: who held control of the car? This video breaks down physical control under Washington law, why a false name or birth date is its own offense, how the implied consent warning and breath test work, and how a roadside lie can grow into a felony risk. ⚖️ Legal Analysis Includes: - RCW 46.61.504: actual physical control of a vehicle - State v. Votava (2003): driving is not an element of physical control - Terry v. Ohio and Berkemer v. McCarty: detention and roadside questioning - RCW 9A.76.175: making a false or misleading statement to a public servant - RCW 46.20.308: implied consent, breath test refusal, and revocation - Birchfield v. North Dakota (2016): breath vs. blood tests - RCW 9.35.020: identity theft - Grades: Officers B+, Driver F 🎓 Educational Purpose: This content is presented under Fair Use (17 U.S.C. § 107) for commentary, criticism, and education. 🔔 Subscribe for more legal analysis of police interactions Fair Use Notice: This video contains body camera footage used under Fair Use for purposes of commentary, criticism, education, and news reporting. The footage is transformative, containing substantial original analysis. No copyright infringement intended. #Bodycam #Police #LegalAnalysis #DUI #FourthAmendment #Washington #Educational #Documentary
Tags
bodycampolicelegal analysisDUI arrestphysical controlimplied consentbreath testWashington Statefalse identityidentity theft

Statistics from the YouTube Data API, tracked by FameX. Views per hour, revenue and comparisons are FameX estimates.