Why America Never Built a Bigger Military Helicopter
Long-form10:00Science & TechnologyPublished Aug 26, 2026, 1:00 PM · 7w ago
Views
496,139
+742 views/hour
Views / hour now
742
measured 2h ago
Peak views / hour
742
2h ago
First 24 hours
—
not tracked from upload
Engagement
1.2%
likes + comments / views
Likes
5.6K
1.1% of views
Comments
272
0.06% of views
Est. ad revenue
$1,985–$4,465
lifetime, $4–9 RPM
Checked every 24 h while the video is this age · last check 2h ago · next in 1267 min. YouTube itself updates public counts with a short delay.
Avg views / day
9.1K
since upload
vs channel median
0.9×
this video's views ÷ the channel's usual
Rank in channel
#7
of 9 tracked
Views over time
0 readings
Total views Views gained per hour
Live tracking started
The chart fills in as FameX records new readings.
Description
For decades, the CH-53E Super Stallion served as the U.S. Marine Corps’ primary heavy-lift helicopter without growing much larger than the variants it replaced. While the Soviet Union built increasingly larger helicopters, including the enormous Mil Mi-26, the biggest helicopter in the world, the Marines took a different approach, evolving the CH-53 to lift heavier loads while keeping its size within a critical constraint.
Beginning with the CH-53A Sea Stallion in the 1960s, the CH-53 family evolved through the CH-53D and eventually the three-engined CH-53E Super Stallion. Nearly four decades after the CH-53E entered service, the Marines continued the same lineage with the CH-53K King Stallion, a significantly more powerful helicopter that still maintains roughly the same footprint.
In this Airspeed video, we break down the engineering of the CH-53E Super Stallion and explain the critical constraint that prevented the U.S. Marines from simply building a bigger helicopter.
This video was created entirely by humans.
Chapters
00:00 – 00:56 — America Chose a Smaller Helicopter
00:56 – 02:16 — The Heavy-Lift Problem
02:16 – 05:28 — Inside the CH-53E Super Stallion
05:28 – 08:16 — The Mi-26 vs. the CH-53
08:16 – 10:00 — Why the CH-53 Wasn’t Bigger
Credits
🎬Special thanks to our team
-Hubert M and Edin S: 3D Modeling & Animation
-Liam S: Editing & Sound Design
-Federico B: Research & Script
-Ben S: Narration
-Lion & Louis: Direction
🧩 3D Assets
Third-party 3D assets used in this video have been purchased under royalty-free licenses.
🎵 Music and Sound
Music and sound design used in this video are licensed via royalty-free music libraries.
📚 Photo and Video Sources
Images and video used in this video are part of the public domain or used under Creative Commons licenses and sourced from:
-Internet Archive: https://archive.org
-Digital Visual Information Distribution System: https://www.dvidshub.net
-National Archives Catalog: https://catalog.archives.gov/
-Wikimedia Commons: https://commons.wikimedia.org
“Sikorsky CH-53E Super Stallion Drawing” — Wikimedia Commons — Edited
Source: [https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sikorsky_CH-53E_Super_Stallion_Drawing.svg]
“Sikorsky CH-53D Sea Stallion Drawing” — Wikimedia Commons — Edited
Source: [https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sikorsky_CH-53D_Sea_Stallion_Drawing.svg]
“Mi-6 (cropped)” — Wikimedia Commons — Edited
Source: [https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Mi-6_(cropped).jpg]
#CH53 #SuperStallion #MilitaryAviation
Tags
CH-53CH-53ECH-53E Super StallionCH-53 Super StallionSuper StallionCH-53KCH-53K King StallionKing StallionCH-53A Sea StallionCH-53DSea StallionSikorsky CH-53Sikorsky CH-53ESikorsky CH-53KMil Mi-26Mi-26CH-53 vs Mi-26Mi-26 vs CH-53heavy lift helicopterheavy lift helicoptersUS Marine CorpsUS MarinesMarine Corps aviationmilitary helicoptermilitary helicoptersSikorskyhelicopter engineeringhelicopter designamphibious assault ship
Details
- Published
- Aug 26, 2026, 1:00 PM
- Length
- 10:00 (600 s)
- Format
- Long-form
- Category
- Science & Technology
- Audio language
- EN
- Quality
- HD
- Captions
- Yes
- Made for kids
- No
- Licensed content
- Yes
- Video ID
- KHyuSCC-ZJQ
More from Airspeed
Why the V-22 Osprey Is So Complicated540K views · 1w ago · +457/h
Why the B-58 Hustler Became Obsolete So Quickly712K views · 2w ago · +293/h
The Plane NASA Rejected, But Still Depends On206K views · 3w ago · +34/h
Why Did the F-82 Need Two Cockpits?747K views · 5w ago · +813/h
Why Did the Spirit of St. Louis Have No Front Window?2.2M views · 6w ago · +594/h
Why the U-2 Spy Plane Is Still Irreplaceable482K views · 2mo ago · +25/h
Why the Boeing 377 Failed684K views · 2mo ago · +208/h
The First Plane to Break the Sound Barrier532K views · 2mo ago · +72/h
Statistics from the YouTube Data API, tracked by FameX. Views per hour, revenue and comparisons are FameX estimates.