FaithSketch TheologyGnosticism Explained: What the Gnostics Really Believed, Not What You've Heard

Gnosticism Explained: What the Gnostics Really Believed, Not What You've Heard

Long-form26:30People & BlogsPublished Sep 7, 2026, 12:00 AM · 6w ago
Views
666
+0 views/hour
Views / hour now
0
measured 8h ago
Peak views / hour
—
 
First 24 hours
—
not tracked from upload
Engagement
2.4%
likes + comments / views
Likes
14
2.1% of views
Comments
2
0.30% of views
Est. ad revenue
$2–$5
lifetime, $2.4–7.2 RPM

Checked every 24 h while the video is this age · last check 8h ago · next in 902 min. YouTube itself updates public counts with a short delay.

Avg views / day
15
since upload
vs channel median
1.5×
this video's views ÷ the channel's usual
Rank in channel
#5
of 21 tracked

Views over time

0 readings

Total views Views gained per hour
Live tracking started
The chart fills in as FameX records new readings.

Description

Gnosticism explained — what the Gnostics really believed, taken from the Nag Hammadi texts themselves rather than the popular story told about them. In the Secret Book of John, the God of Genesis surveys the world he has just made and announces "I am a jealous God, and there is no other God beside me" — and the Gnostic who wrote it meant it as proof the speaker was a blind fool. That is where this video begins. We work through the demiurge Yaldabaoth and the Sophia myth, the Gnostic rereading of Genesis, Valentinus and Ptolemy's Letter to Flora, the three kinds of people (hylic, psychic, pneumatic), Gospel of Thomas saying one hundred fourteen, the Gospel of Philip and the Mary Magdalene claim, and the Gospel of Judas reversal. The evidence comes from hostile witnesses on every side — Irenaeus, Plotinus, and the Gnostic writings themselves. And it lands where most explainers refuse to go: the Gnostics were not the church's forgotten liberals. They were its forgotten aristocrats. Sources: Primary: The Secret Book of John (Apocryphon of John), Nag Hammadi Codex II and the Berlin Codex Gospel of Thomas saying 114; Gospel of Philip; Gospel of Mary; Gospel of Judas (Codex Tchacos) Irenaeus, Against Heresies, c. 180 Ptolemy, Letter to Flora, preserved in Epiphanius, Panarion 33 Plotinus, Ennead II.9, "Against the Gnostics" Tertullian, Against the Valentinians; 1 Timothy 6:20; Exodus 20:5 Secondary: Michael A. Williams, Rethinking "Gnosticism" (1996) Karen L. King, What Is Gnosticism? (2003) David Brakke, The Gnostics (2010) April D. DeConick, The Thirteenth Apostle (2007) Elaine Pagels, The Gnostic Gospels (1979) Lundhaug and Jenott, The Monastic Origins of the Nag Hammadi Codices (2015) Disputed or uncertain: Whether Irenaeus hardened a more fluid Valentinian anthropology into a fixed three-caste system Tertullian's claim that Valentinus was passed over for bishop of Rome — hostile source Gospel of Thomas 114: symbolic reading, plain reading, or later interpolation DeConick's daimon reversal in the Gospel of Judas — widely but not universally accepted Who buried the codices and why: Athanasius 367, Pachomian monks, or neither The 1945 discovery account itself — Robinson's versions vary between two and eight people present #Gnosticism #NagHammadi #EarlyChristianity
Tags
gnosticismgnosticism explainedwhat did the gnostics believenag hammadignostic gospelsthe demiurgeyaldabaothsecret book of johnvalentinusgospel of thomasgospel of judasearly christianity

Statistics from the YouTube Data API, tracked by FameX. Views per hour, revenue and comparisons are FameX estimates.