“വോട്ടവകാശം ആരുടേയും ഔദാര്യമല്ല” | Justice Ujjal Bhuyan on SIR & Voting Rights

The right to vote or right to be included in the voters' list cannot be detached from an Indian citizen.” — Justice Ujjal ബുയാൻ Amid the ongoing controversy surrounding the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls, Supreme Court Justice Ujjal Bhuyan spoke about the constitutional importance of voting rights. He said that a process resulting in the wholesale disenfranchisement of citizens, effectively leaving them without voting rights, would raise serious constitutional concerns. He also linked the issue to Articles 325 and 326 and the principle of universal adult suffrage. � The Indian Express In this episode, we explore: What exactly did Justice Ujjal Bhuyan say? Why is the right to be included in the electoral roll important? What do Articles 325 and 326 provide? What is the constitutional significance of universal adult suffrage? How should electoral-roll accuracy be balanced with protection against wrongful exclusion? What does the SIR controversy mean for voting rights? The Supreme Court is separately hearing petitions challenging aspects of the SIR process, including pleas questioning its legality and the functioning of the Election Commission. � The Indian Express 🎙️ Watch the complete analysis and decide for yourself. #JusticeUjjalBhuyan #SIR #VotingRights #VoterRights #IndianConstitution #SupremeCourt #Democracy #ElectionCommission #IndianPolitics #SIR2026 Justice Ujjal Bhuyan, Ujjal Bhuyan, SIR India, SIR electoral rolls, SIR voter list, voting rights India, right to vote India, voter rights, Supreme Court SIR, Justice Bhuyan SIR, Article 325, Article 326, universal adult suffrage, Indian Constitution, Election Commission India, electoral roll revision, disenfranchisement India, Indian democracy, Supreme Court India