Why I Retired With an 80% Monte Carlo Score
Long-form8:353.2× channel median
Published Sep 1, 2026, 12:00 PM · 6w ago
Scott Unclocked
2.7K subscribers · median 2.5K views
AI avatar · confirmed$Likely
Views
8,109
+1 views/hour
Likes
105
1.3% of views
Comments
44
0.54% of views
Checked every 24 h while the video is this age · last check 22h ago · next in 102 min. YouTube itself updates public counts with a short delay.
Views / hour now
1
measured 22h ago
Peak views / hour
1
22h ago
Avg views / day
185
since upload
First 24 hours
—
not tracked from upload
vs channel median
3.2×
Rank in channel
#4
of 20 tracked
Engagement
1.8%
likes + comments / views
Est. ad revenue
$73–$162
lifetime, $9–20 RPM
Views over time
0 readings · line: total views · bars: views gained per hour
Live tracking started
The chart fills in as FameX records new readings.
Description
My retirement plan had an 80% probability of success—which also meant a 1 in 5 chance of failure.
Would you retire with those odds?
I did.
_________________________________________________________________________________________
📊 PLAN YOUR RETIREMENT WITH BOLDIN
I use Boldin to model retirement scenarios, spending, taxes, and other long-term financial decisions. If you want to build and test your own retirement plan, you can check it out here:
https://go.boldin.com/scottunlocked
Disclosure: This is an affiliate link. If you purchase a paid Boldin plan through my link, I may earn a commission at no additional cost to you.
_________________________________________________________________________________________
In this video, I explain what my Monte Carlo score actually meant, why I didn’t wait for a 95% or 100% result, and how spending flexibility and risk-based guardrails gave me the confidence to retire at 54.
An 80% score did not mean failure was inevitable. It meant that some simulated retirement paths would require me to make adjustments along the way.
I also had to consider the risk on the other side of the decision. Working longer might have produced more money and a higher probability score—but it would also have cost me time during some of my healthiest retirement years.
For me, the decision came down to more than a number:
The math
+ the life I wanted
+ the ability to adjust
= retiring at 54
Would you retire with an 80% probability of success, or would you keep working for a higher score? Let me know in the comments.
RELATED VIDEOS
The rule that helped me retire at 54:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-_q5Q1SeVDA
The 4 questions I wish someone had asked me before I retired:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ieqr9E9uxFw
The best retirement decision I made wasn’t financial:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8fqOGIrhX9k
What we actually spent during my first full month of retirement:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fJZxbRlVdY8
Subscribe to Scott Un
Details
- Published
- Sep 1, 2026, 12:00 PM
- Length
- 8:35 (515 s)
- Format
- Long-form
- Category
- —
- Audio language
- —
- Quality
- —
- Captions
- —
- Made for kids
- —
- Licensed content
- —
- Video ID
- 3uFsoJs_1-o
More from Scott Unclocked
I Retired at 54 — Why I Didn’t Work One More Year7.1K views · 1d ago · +123/h
Our September Retirement Budget: What We Actually Spent After Retiring at 54 + YouTube $$917 views · 5d ago · +1/h
The Retirement Checklist Nobody Gave Me Before I Retired at 542.1K views · 1w ago · +1/h
How I Protect My Retirement When the Market Crashes11.7K views · 1w ago · +2/h
Retiring at 54 Was a Terrible Financial Decision18.9K views · 2w ago · +3/h
I Saved for Retirement… Now I’m Afraid to Spend It4.4K views · 2w ago
Gen X: You May Not Get to Choose When You Retire2.7K views · 3w ago
I Walked Away From a 30-Year Career at 54 — Do I Regret It?4.5K views · 3w ago
Statistics from the YouTube Data API, tracked by FameX. Views per hour, revenue and comparisons are FameX estimates.